Torrent details for "Fly.Me.to.the.Moon.2024.HDCAM.c1nem4.x264-SUNSCREEN[TGx]" Log in to bookmark
Controls:
Language:
EnglishTotal Size:
995.54 MB
Info Hash:
0a4dac53df5354173254db9d5cb4b05181abe804
Added By:
Added:
08-07-2024 03:49
Stats:
| Update
Title:
Zabierz mnie na Księżyc (2024)
Genre:
Comedy, Romance
Runtime:
132 min - Rating: 7
Director:
Plot:
Brought in to fix NASA's public image, marketing maven Kelly Jones wreaks havoc on launch director Cole Davis's already difficult task of putting a man on the moon. When the White House deems the mission too important to fail, Jones is directed to stage a fake moon landing as backup.
Fly.Me.to.the.Moon.2024.HDCAM.c1nem4.x264-SUNSCREEN[TGx]
IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1896747
SOURCE
Fly.Me.to.the.Moon.2024.720p.HDCAM-C1NEM4[TGx]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INFO
Genre: Comedy, Romance
Director: Greg Berlanti
Stars: Scarlett Johansson, Channing Tatum, Woody Harrelson, Jim Rash, Ray Romano
Plot: Sparks fly in all directions as marketing maven Kelly Jones, brought in to fix NASA's public image, wreaks havoc on Apollo 11 launch director Cole Davis' already difficult task of putting a man on the moon. When the White House deems the mission too important to fail, Jones is directed to stage a fake moon landing as backup, and the countdown truly begins.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COVER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCREENSHOTS
(Click to enlarge)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDIAINFO
Container = Matroska (mkv)
Duration = 02:00:48.725
Filesize = 996 MiB
Overall bitrate = 1 152 kb/s
Video
Codec info = AVC High@L3 | V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Resolution = 720x304
Display AR = 2.388 | 2.40:1
Bitrate =
Framerate = CFR 24.000
Color space = YUV
Chroma subsampling = 4:2:0
Encoder = x264 - core 157
Audio
Codec info = AAC | A_AAC-2
Channels = 2
Bitrate =
Samplerate = 48.0 kHz
Language = English
User comments Sort newest first
by Guest-3300
on 2024-07-08 10:52:39
 | Just watch the moon landing deniers climb out from under their rocks. Many nations have satellites orbiting the moon which clearly show the moon landing sites from the sixties. |
by Guest-5555
on 2024-07-08 16:03:15
| not to mention German military base sites on the far side of the Moon from the forties! |
Like 2
Liked by - gevalher
CailenCambeul
CailenCambeul by Brrzrrkrr
on 2024-07-08 19:08:48
 | All true. Besides, had Kubrick shot the moon landing, it would have been much more cinematic and probably containing complex themes about the nature of humanity.  |
Like 2
Liked by - ProudAtheist Anarchist2024
Anarchist2024 by Guest-3279
on 2024-07-10 16:48:20
| the landing of equipment was not really disputed. it was more about the actual people going there. mostly because of the era it took place, where faking it made sooo much sense. but also the issue of Van Allen radiation belt or, when you look up the actual modules, the fact that some walls were literally a piece of foi |
Like 0
by Guest-4109
on 2024-07-11 20:10:45
| This is an awesome movie! The audio isn't really very good, which is a pity, because Johansson is the funniest ever. From the first minute, my wife - who hates romcoms, which this is sorta not - was cracking up. (That's always a good sign). I think ScarJo is more attractive than ever, not covering up that her body's been changing. Confident, full of sass. Try it. |
by FlatEarthPower
on 2024-08-04 05:26:49
 | Truth in plain sight, but the globeheads are still buying the moon landing hoax.  |
by h3ll
on 2024-07-17 03:15:59
| A-6 V-6.5 Basic Romcom entertainment, ran a little long, couldve been 90min. So a conwoman who sold murica product placement to promote NASA with a subplot of filming the moon landing for broadcast. Guess theyre trying to give credence to moon landing deniers that it was filmed but the broadcast was real? What was that Hebrew Nasha connection meaning to deceive? Anyways worth watching if youre on a flight & there is nothing else |
by Guest-2766
on 2024-07-11 01:08:13
| Yt people haven't done anything just once. If they really went to the moon it would be a tourist attraction by now. |
by Guest-2419
on 2024-07-08 14:59:28
| This movie looks like it might be an enjoyable non-woke rom-com. If that's the case I'll take it. |
by Guest-1953
on 2024-07-11 12:20:49
| Uff, this is so much too much of Johanssons' conduct to bear! Even after break couldn't get through this movie because of these disturbing asinine facial expressions and gestures. |
by Guest-2848
on 2024-07-08 14:22:04
| Capricorn one was better than this movie and I don't even have to watch this to know that. BTW, can hollywood come up with some orginal ideas for a change as this is at least the third itteration of this idea I've seen so far. I guess they just needed a part for untalented scarlet. |
by Guest-2474
on 2024-07-08 08:29:00
| It wasn't great before hand either. I guess people see she is just not a great actress. Sincerely. Jackson |
Like 2
by jaxe
on 2024-07-08 13:38:11
 | Why is she even making stuff like this? She made over $75 million from the MCU movies alone and she is worth about $166 million. If I had that kind of money she had, I would stop working. She also sued Disney and Marvel claiming they shorted her $50 million in MCU profits and settled for $40 million |
Like 1
Liked by - Pootle
by cyanide
on 2024-07-08 23:00:07
 | Many of the MCU characters that gained fame, were virtually unknown before they signed up with the franchise, and with MCU gone(as good as), many of them will return to obscurity. |
Like 1
Liked by - Pootle
by Pootle
on 2024-07-10 10:42:32
 |  That's a bit mean, maybe she was offered good money. DeNiro has done some bears of films, still had a pretty good career. |
Like 2
Liked by - KingRagnar ProudAtheist
ProudAtheist by Guest-3166
on 2024-07-08 08:22:02
| They try to normalize the Moon landing scam, they even mention Kubrick...This reminds me that Fargo episode. A Russian cineast actually showed how to reproduce all the techniques used to film scenes on the Moon back in the 60's. |
by Guest-1343
on 2024-07-08 11:12:38
| I've always wondered how people like you manage to get out of the house, with less IQ than a chair it should be impossible to open a door. |
Like 8
by Guest-4628
on 2024-07-08 12:12:14
| Right. And the Earth is flat too, right? Seriously, stop huffing paint. You're starting to sound like Joe Biden. |
Like 8
by Brrzrrkrr
on 2024-07-08 19:11:08
| Guest-3166: You should take a look at the technological marvels SpaceX is generating. Landing on the Moon in 1969 was just the beginning. |
Like 1
Liked by - ProudAtheist
by Guest-3491
on 2024-07-08 21:59:53
| totally agree Brrzrrkrr...space x seems to be leading the way.....nasa's on the backburner as far as going back |
Like 2
Liked by - ProudAtheist Brrzrrkrr
Brrzrrkrr by Mosanator
on 2024-07-09 01:24:15
| Thank you - only looked at this Cam to see who would be the first fake moon landing nut - you get the prize |
Like 3
Comments need intelligible text (not only emojis or meaningless drivel).
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.