Uploaded by TGxTV | Size 19.65 GB | Health [120/262] | Added 21/11/24 08:30 |
Uploaded by rondobym | Size 6.20 GB | Health [17/75] | Added 22/11/24 17:02 |
Uploaded by CheerfulTomato | Size 21.18 GB | Health [11/20] | Added 21/11/24 23:25 |
Uploaded by atomicfusion | Size 54.64 GB | Health [6/24] | Added 29/11/24 03:15 |
I guess some people don't quite remember what the original Cruel Intentions was like. It's not surprising since they never watch movies and only read others' reviews to form their "opinion." |
I know you ain't talking about me because not only have I seen Cruel Intentions 1999 over 3 dozen times, I have also seen over 10,000 movies and videos in my lifetime from just about every country in the world that produces a movie, considering that I owned and ran over a dozen video stores for over 24 years. |
Why would you consider I'm talking about YOU when I said that "some people don't quite remember what the original was like and they never watch movies and only read others' review to form their 'opinion'"? I hurts me that you think of me this way |
Maybe you need to rewatch the original, it wasn't a movie "made for the modern audiences". |
Dangerous Liaisons was the ORIGINAL Cruel Intentions. And was a MUCH better movie. |
@guest-4045 probably because Jaxe is frequently berated about titles he's watched, or hasn't. His opinion isn't respected as well as it should be and it shows; a lot of truly funny and informative things he says are overlooked by guests and members alike. |
Oh, no! It's so sad that two of my favorite commenters think I was badmouthing one of them. I don't know why they got the idea that I was talking about him. It's as if my words have been COMPLETELY misunderstood. I feel terrible guys... Well, anyways |
@Guest-3068 I'm assuming i'm the other favorite commenter because i'm the only other person logged in that's commented on this thread. Thanks! Although, I did not say it was Jaxe you were referring to; I was simply explaining why Jaxe would think it was him. It could be ANYONE. *shifts eyes back and forth* |
Technically "Les liaisons dangereuses" ("Dangerous Liaisons"; 1959) is the original...! |
It seems to be hard to understand what I'm saying... Well if he is happy |
"Cruel Intentions" (2024 - ?) is just another remake of the book "Les Liaisons dangereuses" by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos. Look how many times it's been done!: "Dangerous Liaisons" (1959) "Game of Seduction" (1976) "Dangerous Liaisons" (1978) "Dangerous Liaisons" (1980; TV Movie) "Dangerous Liaisons" (1980; TV Movie) "Dangerous Liaisons" (1988) "Valmont" (1989) "Cruel Intentions" (1999) "Eiskalte Engel" (2001; Video) "Dangerous Liaisons" (2003; TV Miniseries) "Untold Scandal" (2003) "Dangerous Liaisons" (2005; Video) "Dangerous Liaisons" (2012) "Dangerous Liaisons" (2022; TV Series) |
Another reboot made only as an excuse to give lazy DEI actors jobs they could never get on merit |
The rightmost picture on the first line is being considered for traffic sign soon. |
Dangerous Liaisons was the ORIGINAL Cruel Intentions. And was a MUCH better movie version of a novel. Cruel Intentions was made for horny teens. |
Exactly, "Les liaisons dangereuses" ("Dangerous Liaisons"; 1959) is the original...! |
Maybe not. That money is made elsewhere. This is like fostering that one market |
Guess, that title is meant recursively, or to a power of something; i.e. Cruel^2 Intentions; Meh, nowadays PC-. hate this doctrine |
Looking at the screenshots, they took a great 1999 cult classic movie with Sarah Michelle Gellar, Reese Witherspoon and Selma Blair and reboot it into a gay series. Hollywood just can't fucking leave Well Enough Alone!! Here some of the reviews headlines I've found: 1. Prime Video’s ‘Cruel Intentions’ Reboot Is Stale and Unsexy. 2. Prime Video's Spineless TV Remake Can't Manipulate Us Into Liking It 3, Amazon Remake Dishes Out Liaisons Too Sizzle-Free to Feel Dangerous 4. The Cruel Intentions reboot just doesn’t click 5. Prime Video Reboot Is Too Boring to Offend 6. 'Cruel Intentions' Review: A Mostly Toothless Update of the Cult Classic 7. Everyone is incessantly smug and unlikeable |
quick look at the pictures, another soulless production from hollywood, with few exceptions the films should no longer be called art in the US as they are no such thing. I wonder, how dumb are we if this passes off as entertainment? They can not create anything new, no original thought, they can only mimic. |
This is a Canadian production not Hollywood. - Toronto, Ontario, Canada |
Well said Jaxe, good information, it certainly helped me to decide whether to d'load, or NOT! kudo's oh learned one... |
I dont normally agree with jaxe on much but this time he has a point. |
Gay or not, it's the writing that makes it shit either way!! Thx Jaxe. |
Guest-3464, You do know Hollywood makes movies & TV shows in other countries, so what if it's filmed in Canada, it's still a Hollywood production..?! |