Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 1.40 GB | Health [131/27] | Added 20/02/24 06:39 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 8.82 GB | Health [32/3] | Added 20/02/24 05:57 |
Uploaded by webmaster32 | Size 46.43 GB | Health [20/12] | Added 25/04/24 04:09 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 19.87 GB | Health [19/24] | Added 20/02/24 07:15 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 12.23 GB | Health [15/3] | Added 20/02/24 06:54 |
I agree Heathers 1988 is still the best regardless of these shallow rip-offs |
Mean girls mean girls, what you gonna do , what you gonna do when they come for you.. |
People are complaining it's an unecessary reboot etc and yet Tina Fey was the writer of both. Does Tina Fey, as the creator of both, think it's an unecessary reboot? Doubt it. |
You hit a gr8 point, if you were making your living off a "remake" & Royalties, would you take "Millions now vs.being casted for a movie not ready? Time will be much longer & waiting for less up front $$$. Tina wouldn't miss this opportunity, or have to suffer financially in the meantime! Plus this opens up more doors |
Its not a reboot though? Its a movie of the musical. Anyone shouting reboot/remake just shows you how little research theyve done and how little their opinions matter... |
Its not a reboot though? Its a movie of the musical. Anyone shouting reboot/remake just shows you how little research theyve done and how little their opinions matter... |
Just wanted to thank TGx even though I may pass on the movie, per se, for bringing out "MEAN GIRLS" (2024), to us. I realize how much hard work it is, and always appreciate the effort that the entire team takes at getting all the movies out to us! I am extremely grateful, even if personally, I may not catch, or pass on each one! It's a privilege to have the opportunity to be able to be a part of a terrific team here at TGX! Thank you all very much! This is very important, and who else I'm writing this for!:) I spent 30 minutes, watching various parts on my standard 10 year old tv, with the first edition movie that was encoded and released. I hope all of our users, please read MY novel, as up top, the stars are not for rating the MOVIE, they are for rating the quality of the ENCODING! In other words, Audio and Video or if you see me or anyone write (A/V)=10/10=5 stars! Which unless I missed something as I watched the first 10 a section in the middle and just about toward the end of the movie, it's about as "Pristine", of an encoding work, as usual!:) So, please, don't penalize the encoders, by rating the movie above with a "3", as your really hitting encoders. Why does that matter? Because, in this case you see, it may TGx doing the encoding, but we get "Trial Encoders", who produce great quality stuff! So please consider what I'm saying, and if you have any questions about this, feel free to PM myself, or a mod about it! Honestly, think some of you guys/gals that gave it a 4, if that was for encoding are really tough! Anyway, even on CAM/TS(telesync), these guys are so good, the quality of the output is A/V=10/10 imho! Just rate the movie in here with M= (score)...example, 7.5 or 4.0, whatever you think it equates to! Hope this helps, and have an awesome week everyone!:) Always feel free to hit me up with a PM. PS: Some really wonderful & super friendly (which are now staff members taught me & others), & just passing it along! Kindest Regards, RT!:) |
Well said--and needs to be understood. It used to be a standard that everyone knew, but with so many users now that are able to participate in the P2P community, torrent sites are treated/regarded more like IMDb. |
Listen, ReadThis, I absolutely 110% agree with everything you just wrote. With that being said, I have been preaching that exact same message across many torrent sites that I'm a member of. I have been watching cams since '05 and they have come such a long way. Be kind folks, it's free... |
So let's get this right. First there was the movie. Then there was the musical of the movie and now there is the movie of the musical of the movie. Anyone heard the phrase 'flogging a dead horse'? The original film was hardly more than pulp in 2004 in the first place. |
Nothing new. Sweet Charity, Little shop of horrors, Hairspray, Nine. |
So they never should have made Mame, or The King and I, or Chicago? |
another needless remake from dieing Hollywood... AI will take over since it can write an original thought which theyve seem to have lost the art of since Y2K.. |
Another of the many examples of how a contemporary Hollywood, bankrupt of originality and talent, only continues to exist for Hollywood's sake. Not even worth downloading for nothing. |
My apologies @Thawne, I didn't "MEAN" (pun UN-intended) to hit the down arrow, after thinking about it, bc it's your choice! I would encourage you to see the original, bc it's a "classic" (not saying you haven't). Think on "generational" movies, they re-make far to often to align with the younger age group |
Guest-1258 Why did you say you were me, hmm.. trying to catch my attention copycat. I don't write as a Guest in the 1st place, 2nd I don't watch shitty movies. Thawne |
Just one last comment, sorry everyone, for beating a dead horse! They could take some classics, i.e., "The Godfather" or "The Shawshank Redemption", and I'm turning over 100 years from now in my grave saying this, bc it's scary but want to believe there must be copyright laws etc., right? There have to be in the movie industry just like any others, can we all agree on patents, and copyright infringement! However, some of you come back to this point about "Mean Girls" (2024), this adaptation being "turned into", part musical! Is it still a re-make! Of course it is!! Why? It's the law that states you only have to change 20% of a product, for example to make it distinct from the original, however usually they call it something else! Now with a movie, I don't know whether or not, they have to get permission or not(from the original or owners of the movie, author, if alive, etc.), RE: how much of it they want to change before hand, and what it will be or not? Logically, let's think it's common sense! I mean if you had someone come in and make a musical out of The Shawshank Red. are you really going to say Stephen King didn't write it? Ok, sure, I don't think so! So, not debating the point, just saying, that's my view on it, that whether you change x% of the movie to a different genre or not, then why not have the decency to rename the movie? Because certainly you have a new writer, and if you, than change some of the plot, "genius writer"!:) Than we'll stop with "reality" & the "truth", because all the semantics of re-do's, remakes and reboots, etc., or whatever words you others don't care for, simply is just stating facts. |
There were so mamy commas in your comment, ReadThis, that I kept having to stop and restart reading it. Overall though, it made some kind of sense I guess. I still don't know if this movie is a remake or not. Thanks for the words though m8. |
Except in cases of older works that have lapsed into public domain, remakes are always made by the rights holder, or a licensee. In this case the producer and the writer are the same as the original. |