Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 1.40 GB | Health [286/14] | Added 07/05/24 05:55 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 5.65 GB | Health [100/5] | Added 07/05/24 05:31 |
Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 797.33 MB | Health [85/13] | Added 07/05/24 05:34 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 19.32 GB | Health [85/32] | Added 07/05/24 05:37 |
Uploaded by Freddy1714 | Size 31.06 GB | Health [11/6] | Added 09/07/24 09:32 |
And THERE'S the one I was waiting for! Thanks for being so quick on this one guys! |
You can't beat GalaxyRG265 for combined size & video quality. |
Somebody Correct me if I'm Wrong & I most likely am. This 10-bit 1.75GB x265 version is probably equal to almost a 2.5GB x264 version in video quality. It does make sense. This is better than the x264 version with better video & audio quality with it just being 350mb bigger. If you compare the screenshots of the x264 vs the x265 you will see that the x265 is superior & doesn't have as much pixelation. The x264 is still very good but it's just the x265 is more efficient when encoding & compressing. So if the x264 & x265 have the same bitrate then the x265 will have the better quality because it is more efficient. |
Why x265 is bigger in size than x264? The point of x265 is to have better video quality at the same or smaller size than x264. That don't makes sense. |