Torrent details for "Coyote.2023.720p.AMZN.WEBRip.800MB.x264-GalaxyRG" Log in to bookmark
Controls:
Language:
EnglishTotal Size:
796.69 MB
Info Hash:
fd64fd67301a2397787f033f7f8ec12ccc012162
Added By:
Added:
20-06-2023 06:02
Stats:
| Update
Genres:
Thanks for rating :
smarties
(1), jaxe
(1), palmaamlap (4), g6f97wg (1), Moxie (4), zionlion (5), LiberalLesbo (5), GuitarTroy (1), F1shkill2020 (5),
smarties
(1), jaxe (1), palmaamlap (4), g6f97wg (1), Moxie (4), zionlion (5), LiberalLesbo (5), GuitarTroy (1), F1shkill2020 (5), Name
DL
Uploader
Size
S/L
Added
Title:
Coyote (2023)
Genre:
Sci-Fi
Runtime:
101 min - Rating: 9.3
Director:
Plot:
A story of forbidden love in a dystopian future where teleportation technology enables two refugees to escape genocide. When they trust the wrong back-alley teleporter, Ekaterina and Anya are separated. In a desperate attempt to be reunited, our heroines are entwined in an insidious human trafficking ring involving corrupt politicians.
Coyote.2023.720p.AMZN.WEBRip.800MB.x264-GalaxyRG[TGx]
IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt17592600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INFO
Genre: Science Fiction, Thriller, Drama
Director: Dustin Curtis Murphy
Stars: Therica Wilson-Read, Borislava Stratieva, ailish symons, Ruhtxjiaïh Bèllènéa, Chris Kyriacou
Plot: A story of forbidden love in a dystopian future where teleportation technology enables two refugees to escape genocide. When they trust the wrong back-alley teleporter, Ekaterina and Anya are separated. In a desperate attempt to be reunited, our heroines are entwined in an insidious human trafficking ring involving corrupt politicians.
Included subtitles
English, English, English
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COVER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCREENSHOTS
(Click to enlarge)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDIAINFO
Container = Matroska (mkv)
Duration = 01:41:15.499
Filesize = 797 MiB
Overall bitrate = 1 100 kb/s
Video
Codec info = AVC High@L3.1 | V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Resolution = 1280x532
Display AR = 2.398 | 2.40:1
Bitrate = 5 367 kb/s
Framerate = CFR 25.000
Color space = YUV
Chroma subsampling = 4:2:0
Encoder = x264 - core 164
Audio
Codec info = AAC | A_AAC-2
Channels = 2
Bitrate = 224 kb/s
Samplerate = 48.0 kHz
Language = English
Included subtitles
English, English, English
Need anything from us?
Drop your request @
User comments Sort newest first
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-20 19:45:16
 | Thank you GalaxyRG for a nice torrent, great A/V as ever. I actually watched this movie, as opposed to most people that have commented. For starters Rex76 is about as wrong as you can get. The slender lesbians actually do NOT beat up everyone in sight. At one point, a fairly heavy-set --- yet otherwise ordinary --- man, wrestles a gun from three of the women at once. This is NOT a super-100lb-dyke movie; more's the pity for me, because I might have enjoyed it more if it had been  The story had an interesting premise that just didn't make an interesting movie I'm afraid. The acting was middling to good/OK, but the dialogue (as ever in these budget flicks) was wanting. To be honest, the whole movie was wanting I thought, I was just bored. A lingering shot of a man's flabby  in bed didn't help either. Also, Merriam-Webster defines "woke" as follows...1: aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice) 2 disapproving : politically liberal (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme Nothing "woke" in this movie at all really. Anybody saying otherwise is making up their own definition of the word (as the anti-anything but white, straight, and sky-fairy-fearing often do), and most probably has not watched the movie. Thank you for another nice torrent GalaxyRG but it wasn't for me I'm afraid. Your efforts are much appreciated all the same   |
by Guest-3953
on 2023-06-21 00:45:57
 | If your kind can co-opt words and assign them incorrect new meanings (gay, queer, they/them, married, gender, homophobic, etc.) why can't we? By your listed definition #2, using woke to describe attempts at normalizing non-hetero relationships actually does apply. |
Like 3
by Guest-1647
on 2023-06-21 01:00:58
| I think Laura Kipnis said it best when defining the word "woke". “Woke” is a one-word hermeneutics of suspicion, shorthand for the sort of characterology Maugham was performing, dissecting a fulminator’s self-relation and self-delusions. |
Like 0
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 04:12:56
| 3953: As I have detailed elsewhere (and supported with peer-reviewed biological evidence), homosexuality is a perfectly natural state. Your premise is erroneous. If you would like to discuss this in detail, get an account and PM me; this is not the place for such a detailed discussion. |
Like 0
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 04:17:52
| 1647: I am not familiar with Kipnis' work. My training is in the biological sciences, and from the brief reading I have done on Kipnis, she does not appear to have published in any of the journals I routinely consult. If you'd like to educate me, get an account and PM me, I'd welcome the discussion. |
Like 0
by Guest-1544
on 2023-06-21 06:55:36
| 'Interesting premise'   Teleporting refugees /illegal immigrants (movie uses both terms) into the British Houses of Parliament   |
Like 0
by Guest-1371
on 2023-06-21 06:59:33
| #2. 'Woke' is someone who supports 'repatriations' for 'people of color', supports scams such as BLM, believes that it is OK for armed gangs to invade white neighborhoods and beat up and kill white folks. |
Like 2
Liked by - VoiceOfReason datagubben
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 12:55:16
| 1371: I think you've been watching a little too much Fox News, maybe lurking around Truthless Social a bit too long? Get an account, PM me and we can exchange actual data on your arguments (e.g., numbers of victims of US gun crime in socio-economic groupings). Here is not the place for sensible discourse. |
Like 1
Liked by - vaskoegei
by Superbikemike
on 2023-06-21 17:15:31
 | for the real definition of woke i suggest you go back to the 1930s and check not make it up. the stupidity behind the racist ones trying again to take from the black community is never ending how stupid it sounds dosent seem to bother them as they already know there bout stupid asa box of rocks . |
Like 4
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 18:36:01
| Additionally, definitions of words may change over time, keeping pace with society and technology. Dictionaries routinely update their content. The word "wireless" for example meant something very different for my grandmother than for me. A dictionary would at least be common ground from which to begin a discussion. |
Like 0
by Guest-2424
on 2023-06-22 05:14:07
| I appreciate the good work you are doing trying to educate the ignorant red-pilled cult. Unfortunately they cannot think for themselves and only repeat ad nauseum what youtube outrage farmers tell them to think. |
Like 3
by sak500
on 2023-06-20 16:33:04
 | LOL, RARGB comment section being replicated here. I used to find comments there better than the movies they were commenting about |
by Guest-1366
on 2023-06-21 01:29:35
| RARGB comment section @ak500 was Not really a comment section more like a Thank you without all this drama here  |
Like 1
Liked by - Dividual
by Guest-8225
on 2023-06-21 17:42:07
| The internet is a toilet: as soon as people belief the door is closed and they're unseen, they will empty their bowels. Some will still try to be as civilised and quiet as possible; others don't care what the rest of the world hears, smells or will find once they're done. Was so on RARBg, is so anywhere else on the web |
Like 0
by Moxie
on 2023-07-14 16:20:55
 | RARBG's comments section was nothing but "thank you". Anything of substance, even something as innocuous and benevolent as movie trivia or file technical help was often deleted (especially if you were commenting from USA) and the IP banned for no clear reason. Great repository, but sysops were jerks. |
Like 0
by iHacku
on 2023-06-21 11:51:52
 | @JAXE- I think you need re-educating or to just be educated. Physical Threat !!! for suggesting you take up a hobby. Oh well.... I can't continue or entertain your nonsensical explanation. Have a Bless Day  |
by Guest-2486
on 2023-06-20 09:35:21
| First movie for Director Dustin Curtis Murphy. So you know it will be good! |
by Guest-3880
on 2023-06-21 07:14:49
| Often wonder what folks are smokin' when they rate  movies like this as 10/10 over on IMDB Jeez, even the 'Shawshank Redemption' can only must 9.3 Is this really better than than the 'Shawshank Redemption' |
by Guest-3332
on 2023-06-20 11:49:53
| Some of you users still don't know what the * rating system is for ....Quality Not Content |
by Guest-2228
on 2023-06-20 14:04:55
| But to be fair they both are really new here…  |
Like 1
Liked by - LiberalLesbo
by justsomedude6x
on 2023-06-20 19:01:31
| Some of us users do not care. We want movie reviews also. Who cares if a d/l is flawless with speed and great resolution if the show/movie is a woke hot mess? |
Like 4
by Superbikemike
on 2023-06-20 19:46:58
| your sayin the movie is a racists hot mess and your takin bout him |
Like 0
by Guest-3209
on 2023-06-21 01:24:47
| Guest-2228 They are Not and they should know better don't you think ? |
Like 0
by Guest-3789
on 2023-06-21 10:25:51
| So those "some members" make the rules, justsomedude6x? And they don't explain the rules anywhere, so anyone has to guess who is rating what? Yeah, that 'll work… |
Like 1
Liked by - LiberalLesbo
by Moxie
on 2023-07-14 16:29:34
| Stars are for rating technical quality, comments are for rating the content. But, not everyone knows this or adheres to it, so the star ratings are muddled and ultimately unhelpful. But, hey! Stars! Pretty! Am I right?  |
Like 0
by Guest-1840
on 2023-06-21 20:37:01
| Just cause it keeps hurting my brain, are we not supposed to be able to have subtitles for the foreign language being spoken? There's so much of it in the beginning and feels like I should be getting some sort of translation - unless it's intended and it's an artist's choice not to include it! |
by zionlion
on 2023-06-21 04:52:44
| Thanks for the upload. It is a a terrible movie. No lies, the script, the props, the so distonic future is not so distonic. Had to watch it in fast forward. Anyways thanks. |
by Rex76
on 2023-06-20 12:25:43
 | A slender lesbian beating up everyone in sight. A movie of our times. Thanks for the upload. |
by Guest-1913
on 2023-06-21 14:32:50
| Visit the XXX-section. That's what it's there for. |
Like 2
Liked by - LiberalLesbo miok
miok by cyanide
on 2023-06-21 15:27:15
 | Any idea why 365 days, nymphomaniac, Euphoria, Westworld, GOT, Carnivale... hasnt been added in the xxx section already, Guest-1913? |
Like 0
by Guest-3458
on 2023-06-21 17:34:43
| Because they're no porn movies. The fact that there is some nudity in these movies doesn't make them porn. You look for nudity? Find porn. Or you actually buy a three piece costume for a place to put your phone? |
Like 0
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 19:04:42
| Of course, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that this movie did not contain a "slender lesbian beating up everyone in sight" in any shape or form. This is a figment of the imagination of someone who didn't watch the movie |
Like 0
by Sylo
on 2023-06-21 19:15:37
| Guest-3458 Some people prefer non-hardcore or even casual stuff. Maybe thats his kink. I know for a fact, there are groups that prefer unsimulated real sex by non-porn actors in movies over actual adult performer. Theres even a wiki page for that. Either all of that, or its plain trolling. |
Like 1
Liked by - cyanide
by cyanide
on 2023-06-21 19:33:00
| Really funny, if this is not woke, then wth are so many outraging over an incorrect classification? Surely they are not angry over nothing, or merely fans of a movie no ones heard of till now? |
by LiberalLesbo
on 2023-06-21 20:02:10
| Oh it's something alright, just not "woke". I didn't like the movie, but what I like even less is ignorant, irrational contempt directed at a sector of society I happen to be in. I would have thought that was understandable, but it obviously needs spelling out for you. |
Like 0
by Guest-1308
on 2023-06-22 00:11:34
| People are angry because you deliberately misuse a word to dismantle the meaning of it. Discrimination isn't "funny", cyanide and purposely terrorising the social discourse on it is even less "funny". |
Like 1
Liked by - LiberalLesbo
by zionlion
on 2023-06-21 16:35:15
| You are 100% correct. It was a waste of time. I couldn't watch the intro. The guy walks for about 500 meters because of a boom gate in the middle of nowhere, but while he can drive around the boom because there was no fence. The car is a Ford rancher bt50. |
Like 1
Liked by - jaxe
by Guest-8881
on 2023-06-20 14:05:55
| Ah yes, of course, woman on the cover, black women in the screen shots. Way too much fantasy. |
Like 2
Liked by - Bigmeat95 LiberalLesbo
by Guest-1600
on 2023-06-20 17:06:14
| We got suckered in by the IMDB reviews, made it to the first lesbian kiss then started fast-forwarding (never a good sign), then bailed and put on The Price is Right  |
by Guest-3136
on 2023-06-21 11:36:59
| That'll teach you watching a movie for all the wrong reasons. |
Like 2
Liked by - BattleSister LiberalLesbo
Comments need intelligible text (not only emojis or meaningless drivel).
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.