So a "happily re-married" woman decides - just for shits 'n' giggles - to screw with her friends? Does she hope to set one up to go after her husband so she can eliminate the friendship, (or the friend, BANG BANG!)? Is she looking to see which one might want her man so she can set up a threesome? Or is she just a dumb, manipulative bitch? Is this why her first marriage ended? As confused as I am to her possible motives I'm even more confused as to why this is a story anyone would even write, let alone make a film out of. |
All possible x another 1B plots, for whoever in their "wrong" mind! LOL. Until this NOT so ingenious *Plot Spoiler*, No punchline yet, but "most" ppl saw the "horrid" trailer and/or read the IMDB 3rd grader's plot, ok "drumroll please": MAKES 0 sense after "watching this "gripping" comedy? NOT!" |
It's done on purpose to fool people into watching their movie, noticed this on many covers, it's a checkmark for shitty movie. |
Exactly, they breed people to look like famous actors so they can use them for posters. Didn't you know? |
@Guest-2147 Very true Thought that was Karen Gillan on the cover |
Regardless of how often this story has been told in movies as a kid I remember my parents friends pulling this crazy stunt (and many other crazy stunts) Maybe the moviemaker remembers something similar and that's where they got the idea for the movie And the sad thing is folks fall for these stunts |
PS::::::::::::!!!!! (#3 of #3 for Guest(Member) - 2354? ------>#3 of #3...YOU HAVE TO READ FROM BOTTOM TO TOP! If I brought you all the numbers of statistical data from IMDB "results" just from 2021, and 2022, of the ratings and this is by pick your poison, US, or the world/peers, you'll find it yields some interesting yet, some undesirable results. You can break it up into genre, or leave the numbers all concise together. The fact remains that if I may summarize in a few sentences, "There are movies made with lower budgeted, as well as lower ratings (under 4.0), resulting in less than 100 ppl even taking the time to rate a movie on IMDB. The majority of movies even with fair to budgets over $5 Million, for the industry, were said over the last two years, that every 1 in 7 movies to be above a M=5.0, according to the avg. rating score on IMDB by let's say myself or you! That's not a critic, that's all of us on an avg. So when you ask yourself, who is "bitching", "look at 1 in 7"!!!!:)..... and ask yourself, do you wonder why they may not want to even take a chance on some of these movies, because I can't imagine you watching every movie either, only the one's you blame others for voicing their opinion on, "in advance, and those are just called "comments", or "opinions"!:) PS: Remember, the key is "ignore", watch your other 6/7 LOL of the diamonds in the rough?? Whatever floats your boat! It's your world, we just live in it!:) PSS: The numbers tell the truth, and you can keep going further back, if you'd like in time, or slice it up into genre's!:) Just use a function to do it!:) Anyway, no disrespect - joking with ya a bit & just pointing out "pure" facts, by backing it up, that's all!:) Enjoy the movies, and keep "your" comments about negative comments to yourself, remember the book, I mentioned!:) Read it, learn it, live it, respect the members and the site folks, and love it!:) Very Respectfully, RT!:) (End) |
Thanks TGx and to all that came out with all the outstanding movies for the week!:) Always like to thank everyone who works on getting them out to us, and anyone from TGx that had a part in it, at all, including all of our volunteers as well. Special thanks as always to our encoders, and for this movie will give thanks for "Divorce Bait", the encoding was masterful as usual and gave it 5 stars....A/V=10/10, so thank you very much!:) With respect to the movie, think my comments above summarized it enough, although the movie for a comedy wasn't half bad, just wonder where these plots come from? Won't rip it to bad for a script or a plot, bc the acting was solid, and appreciate the fact that at least I could understand the movie. With that being said, would give it an M=4.0-4.5 in that range somewhere, and there are better comedies out there, and would recommend watching one! Have a great weekend everyone!:) RT!:) |
Second Page, --->>> (#2 of #3) for Guest(Member) - 2354? --->(#2 of #3)...because of the character limit, and they don't want well deserved novels! :) LOL Here's what you "SEE", more written bad then good...IYNSHO(IN YOUR NOT SO HUMBLE OPINION), so that's your point, right, wrong! Just ignore what everyone writes, don't read them, you don't have too, no one is forcing you too, and focus on what's only yours, if you like a movie, write about it, and ignore the 100 of us that write something you don't care for( please never read my terrible horrible stuff...LOL), bc you won't change your(s) or our opinions, and whether you think I saw the movie or not, or whether @Jaxe will comment on 6/7 movies or not, you won't get him to change either! The point is, if we think you saw the movie or didn't is childish, and you on me, for instance, cmon', we're not 2 years old!:) LOL I could care less, and so could @Jaxe or I would venture to guess about 99.9% of our other members, but I could be off 1% :) If you're not a numbers guy, than you can't say anything and if you are, then read below, because, I never judge a person! Look at the data and see why @Jaxe makes his comments, and guess what, he doesn't go by the numbers either! I'm not analytical by any means, well once in awhile, I'll look at the numbers and then actually "THINK"!:) Does it matter, not really, why, bc I'm not KING at the site!:) Right, right! So, I just shut it, and what's the point, really, did you ever read the book "How to lose friends and tick everyone off"...yeah, LOL Ahhhh, come on...LOL We all know you did, anyway many of us read the opposite, the classic!:) Highly suggest reading that one, so you don't "bitch" at anyone!:) Thank you! (End of #2 of #3) |
Looks like homemade porn to me. Now we know why she wanted to know who was interested in her husband. |
I could tell you to watch the movie so you'd know what's happening in that screen shot, but I know that's asking for way too much. Why watch when you can bitch without? |
THESE 2 are for ---->>> (#1 of #2) Hey Guest(Member) - 2354? (Character limit of 320 ---this must be 1940?) Who knows, but another I won't say it! LOL ---> Let me phrase this about as "politically NON-correct" as I can. I try to put the shoe on the other foot, so I did take a look at what you said, I want you to know that up front or behind, however you look at things, probably from Uranus...bc I said behind! LOL just teasing :) ( This is common sense ...and I have to break this up into 2 or 3 bc it should be written in one and having a capacity of 320 characters is dark ages, come on guys!)? With that being said, I usually will throw the same thing right back at ya'.... Wouldn't you say what you just said is "bitching" at people? Instead, why say anything at all, and keep it to yourself? The point is, if you have a "review", because I actually saw the (6/7) movie & you did too, (this will make sense later in this paragraph, LOL), I wrote about it, and whether it was good, bad or indifferent, ppl such as yourself could view it in any capacity you or I want, it's a free internet, sort-a-speak!:) I didn't like my metaphor, but threw it in, well, bc it's late, and it's poor commenting on a comment such as this comment to begin with...,but and my pea-brain couldn't think of anything right now, when typing...so you get what you get, oh well!:) Yeah, I get your point that many do not watch the movies(hey I don't watch a ton either), and I might even "chime" in, but you'll often see statements that they/we will take a chance on the movies too, or even make positive "comments"/"opinions" toward movies, directors, people in them, etc., and haven't even seen them either(@Jaxe in particular!!), so please insert foot before saying what you did, and be so kind, thank you!:) Please give folks a chance, you are simply "judging" ppl , and that's wrong, IMNSHO!:) In my not so humble opinion!:) Hmmmmmm, sounded ok, for a longer than needed Acronym!? Ahhh, whatever!;) (End of #1 of #2) |