Torrent details for "Intervention.2022.720p.WEBRip.800MB.x264-GalaxyRG" Log in to bookmark
Controls:
Language:
EnglishTotal Size:
797.58 MB
Info Hash:
81f97e0425f1817455063bb2a8950beb4a581a11
Added By:
Added:
22-04-2022 01:30
Stats:
| Update
Name
DL
Uploader
Size
S/L
Added
Title:
Intervention (2022)
Genre:
Horror, Thriller
Runtime:
n/A - Rating: n/A
Director:
Plot:
Laura Green suffers from amnesia after a near fatal attack causing her memories to be erased every night once she goes to sleep. Each morning she must reacquaint herself, painstakingly piecing together fragments of her jagged past from cryptic clues on her computer. When her friends video call her to celebrate her birthday, reminding her of a life she cannot recall, she becomes suspicious. Are they being completely truthful? Are they even her real friends? Laura soon learns that her friends are not who they say they are, and the truth behind her attack that harbours the key to a sinister twist to her own identity.
Intervention.2022.720p.WEBRip.800MB.x264-GalaxyRG[TGx]
IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/title/null
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INFO
Genre: Horror, Thriller
Director: Samesh Ramjattan
Stars: Amber Doig-Thorne, Bibi Lucille, Laura McQuiggin, Jasmine Rachelle, Lucia France
Plot: An amnesiac suspects that the friends trying to help her recalls her memories are hiding the truth about her near fatal accident.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COVER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCREENSHOTS
(Click to enlarge)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDIAINFO
Container = Matroska (mkv)
Duration = 01:45:15.243
Filesize = 798 MiB
Overall bitrate = 1 059 kb/s
Video
Codec info = AVC High@L3.1 | V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Resolution = 1280x718
Display AR = 1.781 | 16:9
Bitrate = 6 637 kb/s
Framerate = CFR 29.970
Color space = YUV
Chroma subsampling = 4:2:0
Encoder = x264 - core 164
Audio
Codec info = AAC | A_AAC-2
Channels = 2
Bitrate = 164 kb/s
Samplerate = 48.0 kHz
Language = English
Need anything from us?
Drop your request @
User comments Sort newest first
by Guest-8534
on 2022-04-23 22:45:58
 | I must admit I thought that chick l ked quite hot... until I sptted 'Arclight Psychiatric Hospital'     |
by ReadThis
on 2022-04-22 09:17:19
 | That was very ingenious! :) Like how you put that my friend! ;) |
Like 0
by Guest-5134
on 2022-04-22 13:17:21
| Don't you realise how pathetic it is that the same old sorry bunch has to back each other every time to at least get some positive reaction? |
Like 0
by TopDollar
on 2022-04-23 00:11:44
 | Man movies suck anymore this is 50 First Dates. Here's an idea write something original. |
by YellowGrenade
on 2022-04-24 20:05:00
 | Every filmmaker in Hollywood wants to do something Original, but the sad fact is that Hollywood is a business and they rarely take chances on original stories, They want the kind of stories and movies that have already proven successful. Anybody who's ever read a screenwriting book knows this sad fact to be true. |
Like 0
by Guest-3667
on 2022-04-23 22:44:12
| What in God's name operating system is that?  Lks like Windoze 95 from where I am sittin' right here on the dock of the bay  |
by Guest-2290
on 2022-04-23 22:42:37
| So this is like 'Momento' expect that instead of leaving 'Post-it' notes all over the place she leaves Sticky Notes on her computer desktop |
by jaxe
on 2022-04-22 18:15:01
 | This movie looks even cheaper than this other one: https://torrentgalaxy.to/torrent/14817862/Were-All-Going-to-the-Worlds-Fair-2021-720p-WEBRip-800MB-x264-GalaxyRG That one ^^^ looks like it was shot with a flip phone. This one looks like it's shot with a 8mm. The ones they used to do adult films loops in the 1960's. |
by Guest-3930
on 2022-04-22 21:35:36
| Cut jaxe some slack, man. If anyone knows what they filmed pornos with in the 1960's, it's him. |
Like 0
by jaxe
on 2022-04-22 21:48:33
| @Guest-1632 who said: "Shooting movies with a phone in the sixties. Sure." You don't know anything do you? I said this movie looks like it was shot with 8mm, same thing they used in the 1960's. 8 mm is not a phone. Go read an encyclopedia instead of lurking around here as a Guest posting ignorant comments. |
Like 2
Liked by - TopLevelBigot tosgravely
tosgravely by Guest-2292
on 2022-04-22 22:58:42
| Rather a guest posts ignorant comments than members boasting their lack of knowledge. |
Like 0
by Guest-2538
on 2022-04-23 15:46:11
| I see you keep your end of the bargain, tosgravely. Keep on trolling the comment section — it'll soon be over. Thanks to members like you. |
Like 1
Liked by - tosgravely
by tosgravely
on 2022-04-23 18:21:04
 | @Guest-2538 Just leaving friendly neighborhood comments for guests that make outstanding remarks =) |
Like 1
Liked by - TopLevelBigot
by YellowGrenade
on 2022-04-24 20:01:16
| I Don't think I've ever loved or hated a movie based on the kind of camera they used to shoot it. I've seen terrible movies shot with the most advanced tech, and I've seen great movies that were produced cheap, with low-tech cameras. Technology will always take a backseat to Good storytelling. |
Like 0
by YellowGrenade
on 2022-04-24 20:08:14
| I have no idea if this movie is good or not, but it would be silly to dismiss it purely based on what kind of camera was used to film it. |
Like 0
by Guest-3081
on 2022-04-23 16:09:50
| That "term" is getting too old and corny. Give it a rest. |
Like 1
Liked by - cfcpat25
Comments need intelligible text (not only emojis or meaningless drivel).
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.
