(I am a different Guest poster) If you are saying that you took a standard 44/16 recording and upsampled it to 96/24... then that's a very bad idea. You may not be able to hear it, but you will lose some quality, while ending up with a larger file size. The loss in quality comes from "blurring" together the various samples, because the original and final sample rates don't evenly align. It's possible that at some moments you'll get something that sounds better (as you can with "tweening" in video) but you will always lose fidelity. |
Some information about the source of this 24/96 Remaster/Reissue would be appreciated. I cannot find this issue on the internet..... |
Hi, This is a remaster I made in my Audio program. I thought this work would be a good suspect. Would you care to comment on the 24/96 quality. ??? Take care, mainlyclassical |
Thank you very much for your reaction. My experience is that upsampling does not do the job to create better quality, alas But thanks for your effort: I will give it a chance and listen to your project.... |