Torrent details for "Pat.Garrett.and.Billy.the.Kid.1973.50th.Anniversary.Cut.2160p.UHD.Blu-ray.Remux.DV.HDR.HEVC.FLAC1.0-..."    Log in to bookmark

wide
Torrent details
Cover
Download
Torrent rating (2 rated)
Controls:
Category:
Language:
English English
Total Size:
79.32 GB
Info Hash:
8097071a3c88de34d654b094a46f0d60579c85bc
Added By:
Added:  
28-06-2024 23:41 (edited 28-06-2024 23:42) by webmaster32:_trusted_uploader::_junkie::_turtle:
Stats:
| Update
Genres:
wide



Thanks for rating :
Zardoz001:_male: (5), umutcan3327:_male: (5),

Similar torrents

Name 
DL
Uploader
Size 
S/L 
Added
-
8.68 GB
1,119
[18/6]
18/02/24 16:59
Uploaded by BigDadE:_trusted_uploader: Size 8.68 GBHealth [18/6]Added 18/02/24 16:59
-
111.70 GB
799
[2/5]
09/07/24 06:37
Uploaded by takearushfan:_trusted_uploader: Size 111.70 GBHealth [2/5]Added 09/07/24 06:37
-
995.17 MB
7,908
[1/1]
29/05/21 17:40
Uploaded by GalaxyRG:_trusted_uploader: Size 995.17 MBHealth [1/1]Added 29/05/21 17:40
-
600.13 MB
697
[0/0]
09/06/22 03:28
Uploaded by TGxMovies:_trusted_uploader: Size 600.13 MBHealth [0/0]Added 09/06/22 03:28
Genre:
Biography, Drama, Western
Runtime:
122 min    -    Rating: 7.3
Director:
Plot:
It's 1881 in New Mexico, and the times they are a'changing. Pat Garrett, erstwhile travelling companion of the outlaw Billy the Kid has become a sheriff, tasked by cattle interests with ridding the territory of Billy. After Billy escapes, Pat assembles a posse and chases him through the territory, culminating in a final confrontation at Fort Sumner, but is unaware of the full scope of the cattle interests' plans for the New West.

Description
wide
General
Filename.......: Pat.Garrett.and.Billy.the.Kid.1973.50th.Anniversary.Cut.2160p.UHD.Blu-ray.Remux.DV.HDR.HEVC.FLAC1.0-CiNEPHiLES.mkv
FileSize.......: 79.3 GiB
Duration.......: 1 h 57 min


Video
Codec..........: HEVC  Main 10@L5.1@High
Resolution.....: 3840x2160
Aspect ratio...: 16:9
Bit rate.......: 96.0 Mb/s
Frame rate.....: 23.976 fps
Color primaries: BT.2020 - Dolby Vision / HDR10


Audio
Language.......: English  
Channels.......: 1 CH
Format.........: FLAC
Bit rate.......: 605 kb/s


Audio (#2)
Language.......: English  
Channels.......: 1 CH
Format.........: Dolby Digital
Bit rate.......: 192 kb/s
(Commentary by editors Paul Seydor and Roger Spottiswoode, and critic Michael Sragow)


Subtitle.......: English
Subtitle.......: English (SDH)
Subtitle.......: English (SDH / PGS)

Source: Criterion Collection UHD Blu-ray (thanks KAKAROT!)

50th Anniversary Release
Supervised and approved by editor and author Paul seydor and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid coeditor and colorist Roger Spottiswoode, this new 4K master was created from the 35mm original camera negative and a 35mm color reversal intermediate. The original monaural soundtrack was remastered from the two-inch DME magnetic track. This cut represents a continuation of work begun by Seydor for the special edition released on DVD by Warner Bros. in 2005. That version restored most of the scenes removed for the film’s theatrical release, and featured additional tightening by Spottiswoode and fellow Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid editor Robert L. Wolfe, both frequent collaborators of Peckinpah’s. The 50th Anniversary Release corrects the earlier version’s color grading and sound mix, and includes “further changes we felt were necessary in order to come closer to what Peckinpah himself wanted,” according to Seydor and Spottiswoode. Those include the reinstatement of “the scene in the script called ‘Tuckerman’s Hotel,’ and a few lines of additional dialogue in other scenes. The only scene the anniversary release does not retain from the 2005 version is the ‘Prostitutes montage,’ which followed Garrett forcing Ruthie Lee to reveal where the Kid is.” (This montage—which Spottiswoode and Katy Haber, Peckinpah’s Personal assistant, believe the director would have eventually removed had his work on the film continued—can be seen in the Final Preview Cut.)

Image error
Image error
Image error
Image error

  User comments    Sort newest first

by Wino
    on 2024-06-29 17:53:24
avatarThank you!
2 |
:) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg

CAPTCHA Image 
Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes
by Guest-3202
    on 2024-06-30 00:14:45
avatarExcellent..... thank you! I'm grateful, but too bad these UHD 4k movies weren't compressed to h.265 at around 20gb or so. When done correctly you cant see a difference in image quality. RARBG was great for that. Thanks CiNEPHiLES!
1 |
:) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg

CAPTCHA Image 
Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes
by Guest-1908
    on 2024-07-02 09:24:42
avatar@Guest That Prefer The So-called UHD Downsamples - First, let's be *technical correct* shall we. *UHD's* labels, in this industry, are defined as ONLY; *4K UHD BluRay's sources* (BDMV, REMUXes, ect) just because some users inappropriately label UHDs into something else doesn't mean that it is accurate; the "2160p or just 4K" labels are for everything else, though (4k/2160p WebDLs, 4K Streaming Services [MAX, Disney +, ATV+, ect.] converging(s), ect.). Second, your LG C3 is industry known to have serious flickering issues [mainly due to PWM], ect., so, not a good reference for a *solid* image quality benchmark ref. Third, lowering the quality in many post-processing workflows will ALWAYS deduce more COMPRESSION ARTIFACTS (crush, colour banding, ect) but... I do agree that SOME users are not as perceivable to notice these inferior anomalies... but that doesn't mean that *most*, especially a cinephile, ect; won't notice it either.
0 |
:) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg

CAPTCHA Image 
Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes
by Guest-2165
    on 2024-06-30 14:01:25
avatarI can tell the difference on my projector setup. Hard drive space is cheap. Compress it yourself if you want it smaller.
0 |
:) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg

CAPTCHA Image 
Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes
by Guest-1689
    on 2024-06-30 16:10:59
avatarHave you ever compared an uncompressed with an compressed h.265 at the sizes I mentioned frame by frame and side by side? I have many times and you can't tell a difference. Now audio is a different story but H.265 video is so efficient its darn near impossible. You believe what you want but it doesn't make it true.
by Guest-4152
    on 2024-06-30 11:14:51
avatarthx for this, and dont ever compress please as i view my movies on a 3 meter wide scope screen trough a JVC N7 . I'm verry happy to have these full file sizes:)
0 |
:) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg

CAPTCHA Image 
Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes
by Guest-2319
    on 2024-06-30 12:41:55
avatarI have a JVC DLA X790 projector with a 120 inch screen and a 77 inch LG C3 0LED TV and I challenge you to tell the difference between a well compressed h.265 disc down to 20 to 25 gb to uncompressed. You cant, especially on older movies that were shot on film like this one.

Post anonymous comment
  • Comments need intelligible text (not only emojis or meaningless drivel).
  • No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
  • Use common sense and try to stay on topic.

  • :) :( :D :P :-) B) 8o :? 8) ;) :-* :-( :| O:-D Party Pirates Yuk Facepalm :-@ :o) Pacman Shit Alien eyes Ass Warn Help Bad Love Joystick Boom Eggplant Floppy TV Ghost Note Msg


    CAPTCHA Image 

    Anonymous comments have a moderation delay and show up after 15 minutes