Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 29.26 GB | Health [533/106] | Added 15/04/24 03:17 |
Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 1.60 GB | Health [523/38] | Added 06/04/24 05:24 |
Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 6.59 GB | Health [170/16] | Added 05/04/24 22:28 |
Uploaded by NAHOM1 | Size 67.81 GB | Health [121/23] | Added 27/05/24 06:02 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 7.97 GB | Health [106/16] | Added 15/04/24 03:01 |
Uploaded by TGxMovies | Size 18.23 GB | Health [101/25] | Added 15/04/24 08:19 |
Thanks for the upload! No complaints about stereo sound from me. As far as I'm concerned, this is the perfect release for mobile devices! Can't wait for the full 4K/1080p HDR release. Excuse my ignorance, but 10bit in the title can't be referring to 10bit color considering the 8bit source correct? Is it referring to audio or something else? |
For a 2hr 45min movie the Video Quality is Outstanding for just a 2GB file. Thanks GalaxyRG. |
Well that's the difference of x265 and x264, but I still avoid x265, because it is sometimes still too bitrate starved for a 27" monitor. |
This is a great movie. Saw it in the cinema and going to watch it again at home! |
The MB's that are saved with using 2-channel instead of 5.1-channel sound can go towards a higher video bitrate. That is fine with me. 2-channel is all I need as long as it's clear audio. Your not missing much with not having Surround Sound. It is another Gimmick to sell Suckas crap. Just like the 3-D TV! |
@ToeCutter Apparently you have never been in a home theater with a $5k audiophile system. There is a HUGE difference in the movie experience, especially action flicks, ie Terminator 2, Aliens, etc. |
@ToeCutter this isn't 1600MB version, there isn't such a thing as "MB's that can go towards a higher video bitrate" in this version. Also I prefer 5.1 cause one of the channels will have main voices and I can amplify this if need be. |
Sailor420: I'm glad you enjoy surround sound, but many of us don't. My main stereo system costs as much as most people spend on cars, and it's 2.1 (two studio monitors & a sub) & excels with movies. I also enjoy music/video on my desktop headphone setup ($8,000 as of now) which of course isn't surround sound! |
I have seen rich people spend $100K on a sound system. I am not saying that 2 channel is better than 5.1 or higher not by any means. I am just saying that all I need is a 2.1 channel system. A 2.1 Channel is better for music than a 5.1 or higher system. I am sure that a full home theater is much better. |
I bet Dune Part ll sounds killer with a 13.4.4 system! |
Toe - We're not rich. But two incomes, no kids, & not caring much for most material things (I proudly have never spent more than $15k on a car & hope I never will) = some luxuries. Most audiophiles mock people with systems more than 2.0, even 2.1. I'm not that snobish lol. But I do dislike surround sound. |
Yep I hear ya. I am a Poor-Boy as well. I have heard good surround system but like a 2.1 system the best. I would never spend more than $2k on my Sound system cause I am Poor as well. Everybody likes something Different. To each his/her/it/them own. Damn FurrowedBrow I bet that Headphone System sounds Killa. |
Why not any eng 5.1 source available??? Can anyone enlightened me? |
first world problems: seeing it in cinema somewhat dulls the excitement of seeing it on torrent haha |
I compared this to Dune.Part.Two.2024.1080p.WEB-DL.H.264.Dual.YG 6.74GB (Spanish), and quality is slightly better over there. |
Apparently the main SOURCE release is from Spanish country with the primary audio in Spanish 6ch. The YG encode is the only one 6ch audio, but it's Spanish. |
Well, this is x265, it's meant to have a lower bitrate using a better encoder, this smaller file size, and as close to AVC/H.264 quality as possible. Hopefully a 5.1 version will come out and a new GalaxyRG265 version will follow, anyway, for a nearly 3h movie I'd expect it to be bigger... |