![]() | Well, on my tiny 60" TV, you don't see the difference between a rip that is 3/4 GB and your huge rip. Believe me, I have been in the download business in twenty years. |
![]() | Nice work. Much appreciated . Please keep doing the Remux with full video and lossless audio. Thanks |
![]() | Thanks for this Truffaut. Unfortunately, the size is too big for me. |
![]() | Cut him some slacks, he is obviously new at it. Better big size than nothing although you find high quality rips of this movie with hardcore subtitles other places. |
![]() | This is not a Rip. Lots of funny kids commenting :) |
![]() | @Guest-1262 Because the algorithms for scaling, macroblock reduction and hardware support of all popular codecs are very advanced. Even XviD 700mb looks good. That's why original A/V is most often downloaded by collectors and uninformed users. You've been doing this for 20 years, and you write as if you were born yesterday and can't explain it. Greetings Asmodexia :) |
![]() | I do not understand half of your message but I can assure your that none 700mb rip look good but ALL my minimum 3GB rips in HD are top notch. But none are of those sizes you post here. I consider myself a professional downloder. |
![]() | I don't use algorithms, I just use my 20 years experience and I am totally happy with it. I have a rip of that movie, same quality as your shitty rip, just the annoying hardcored English subs. This conversation is over. |
![]() | Not possible to answer. None of my messages are published. So, there is not the possibility to pursue this conversation. |
![]() | Guest-3259 And after 20 years you don't know the difference? You called the original REMUX a shitty rip. Congratulations :) |