File | Size |
---|---|
Free Premium Accounts at OfficialMrB.com.txt | 768.00 B |
IGG-GAMES.COM.url | 196.00 B |
PCGAMESTORRENTS.COM.url | 202.00 B |
README.txt | 338.00 B |
rune-cities.skylines.ii.iso | 51.40 GB |
rune.nfo | 4.39 kB |
_INSTALL TUTORIAL.txt | 1.69 kB |
The game is so horrible optimized it does not even run well on high-high-high end rigs. This post from Reddit is said to better what is awful. Optimal Settings Don't go around reducing the global settings thinking it's your only option. A lot of the graphics settings have no impact on the FPS, while there are some key ones that have massive impacts. Start with a High Preset and then Use "Fullscreen Windowed" or disable VSync Disable "Depth of Field Mode" Reduce "Volumetrics Quality" to Low Disable "Global Illumination" Reduce the "Level of Detail" to Low (or Medium if you don't need the extra FPS) Disable "Motion Blur" (This is a preference, if you want it, keep it on Low) In the advanced tab, scroll to the Shadows section and disable "Terrain Casts Shadows" If you want to squeeze a bit more performance, Disable "Fog Quality", though I personally prefer to keep it enabled These settings should give you the best looking graphics while also increasing your FPS significantly |
Runs fine on my system with most things on high. 5800X3D with a 7900 XTX and running at 4k between 50-60fps. Don't know why everyone thinks every game must run at a ne less than 500 FPS. City builders don't need high FPS. If you're game run's poor, get a CPU with more cores. The Simulation in this is very CPU dependent |
Im getting 14fps at 4k on a 5800x3d and a 4080, maybe some problem with nvidia drivers then |
@hgbs Nah, the game is just poorly optimized. But apparently it is you and your poor CPU that falters. Get one with more cores. Or some people are just wrong and think they know more than the collective gaming world that get 25 FPS in the freakin menus with really high end rigs. The strawman of 500 fps seems far off... |
The cpu is almost doing nothing, the gpu is what's going full throttle to run the game, tweaking some settings i was able to run at a steady 60fps, but the game looks horrible with textures not loading and stuff like that, good thing i didn't buy the game, thanks for the upload |
Oh i know, i was refering to the blatant arrogant gibberish of t3chington above. However, the developers, likely also wrong according to some guy in this thread, has adressed the poor performance of their game. A steady 30 FPS is their end game goal and sure, it is fully acceptable in a game like this. |
Sorry if someone more intelligent and knowledgeable with decades of experience has a different experience counter to what you report. Plenty of not negative review on Steam and the internet out there where people have just fine performance. But like I said people are gonna bitch even if it's free. |
Thanks for this. Even though I don't have an old PC, 3070 Ti, 64 GB ram, i9-11900K @5.3Ghz (turbo) I was still getting ~13 fps in 1440p mode. "Depth of Field Mode" and "Volumetrics Quality" did the most. Disabling DoF instantly gave me 60 FPS in the main menu. Using "Low" DoF settings now and FPS ~50-60 ingame. |
t3chington: I'm impressed on how you know better than the collective gaming community. I'm impressed that you know better than the developers that have adressed their issues. I'm impressed that you know better than the games that give this game quite a bash in reviews. |
Stop inventing strawmen with your 500 fps, literally no one asked for that. EVERYONE knows you're wrong when even the developers say so. Take the loss and move on! At some point even a narcissistic asshat needs to realize when the game is lost. You lost. Game over! Wrong! You are! Faulty! Deal with it. :handheart: |
I appreciate the quick release! Been looking forward to this, but knowing the model CS1 used, the full game will go on sale in the not too distant future, but until then, I gotta try before I buy. |