Uploaded by GalaxyRG | Size 1.94 GB | Health [14/1] | Added 20/11/23 10:57 |
Thank you GalaxyRG. great A/V as always. I downloaded this because I liked the first one. I had high hopes because I love Candice Bergen, Jane Fonda, Diane Keaton, and Mary Steenburgen, and have rarely seen poor performances from any of them. Unfortunately, this movie was a complete let-down. I didn't find it funny at all, I didn't find the characters believable. Very few women, especially friends, react the way these ladies do; if they did, they would have very few friends. I don't think that this director, or the writer, crafted a good narrative, or got the best from a high-class cast. Overall it was very disappointing, but thank you to the uploader regardless. Love you GalaxyRG Thanks a bunch |
funny to see Jane taking pot shots at Robert Redford to try and hold on to what little relevance shes gained from appearing in the crap buddy b movies. Hard pass from me! |
Hanoi Jane is always a hard pass. Consorting with the enemy during wartime used to be a death sentence. |
She's saving the planet by putting all that recycled plastic in her face, so it doesn't go into the landfill. |
She visited Hanoi - the N. Vietnamese capitol - at their government's request, did radio spots there imploring the U.S. to stop bombing N. Vietnam, had her picture taken on an AA gun used to shoot down American planes. THAT'S "consorting with the enemy" in a nutshell! |
""Consorting": spending time with someone." Maybe you need a new dictionary. |
Let's just cut to the chase instead of going back and forth! She is, and always has been, a traitor freak! |
You get out of jail on parole. You get picked-up by police with another parolee. You both go back to prison for violating your parole. The charge: "Consorting with a known felon" - just for being in the other's company. Hanoi Jane consorted & collaborated, period. |
And where do we find the definitions of words used in law books? According to the criminal statutes, Jane was guilty. The only reason she wasn't prosecuted was because she's the daughter of movie star and bronze star winner Henry Fonda. |
When you do radio spots at home against the war, you're protesting. When you do the same from the enemy's capitol, you're collaborating. Under the law, she committed acts of treason. Like it or not, she was guilty & should've faced justice. |
For those who want to know the truth and not blindly follow what these extremists over her claim: https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/8920 |
Yeah, it's on the internet so it must be true |
Please care to read. It's not overly long and it makes most of the anger on this page redundant. |
Would you want to be lynched by a mob that doesn't care for justice, laws, reason? By a mob that doesn't even want to be informed? You hate a woman who showed you and the world how utterly wrong this war was. And I know it hurts to be sent abroad for no valid reason and get killed, but that's not Jane Fonda's fault. That's the government and the weapon industry to blame for. Direct your anger where it should be instead of on someone who was right and in her right to protest against a meaningless and costly operation that killed almost 60,000 of your fathers, brothers and sons. She didn’t kill them, your government did. You would want the law to be different? Then too you have to address your government, not her. |
Superbikemike makes an interesting and correct point when he says: "would these be the same type of books that say columbus discovered america".It shows two things: 1) how Euro-centered man was and 2) that science is ever evolving. How Euro-centered man was is evident in the fact that Europeans "discovered" land where indigenous people had lived for millenniums, that a European was the first to reach a mountain top where the local population had to help him get there. Only what Europeans (and by extension: all Western people) did mattered — rings a bell? Science tries to explain reality and the world by looking for facts. Human problem is interpretation. Facts are interpreted and interpretations can and will alter over time. Not the fact itself (otherwise it wouldn't be a fact), but the interpretation of that fact. So yes, now that we know that white man is not the only man, we can finally interpret Columbus' true deed: he was the first thoroughly documented European to reach a continent that was up to that point unknown to Europeans or at least not shown on any map. But that's not a discovery, because native Americans were there for thousands of tears already, on both American continents. If anyone, THEY discovered America. |
Nicely put 1569 (except for the bit about "millenniums" -- I prefer "millennia" but hey, Merriam-Webster likes 'em both ). But, er... who are you arguing so well with, and what are you arguing about? Did Mikey chime in then delete his post or something? |
Not my kind of film at all, but is never too late to travel and have fun in Firenze just don't forget your meds for high pressure and osteoarthritis. |
Fun fact - You can go to any VFW Hall in America and urinate on Jane Fonda's face in the men's room. |
3562 I've only been in one men's room in my entire life (and I was very, very drunk), so I wouldn't know, but it did seem a bit of a stretch |