curiously, with 8 billion people on earth, any CAM here is made by a guy from slotslights.com. |
I was thinking that same thought the other day. It's quite amazing, isn't it? |
Codec info = AVC High@L3 | V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC Resolution = 720x304... this should tell you it will be on anything bigger that a cell phone screen. |
All this talk about CAMS good, bad, watch a CAM if you want, personally I dont want to ruin any movie by watching a CAM there is no good CAM just whatchable sometimes, sound often tinny? CAMS shopuld be stopped and just waitv a bit longer. |
There's no need to stop offering cam recordings when people want them. You're correct however that this perpetual whining about cams has to stop. People who don't want cams have no reason to even visit this section. When they do, they know what they get, so no reason for bitching. |
Now if j wants something litimate to really complain about how about the fact that this started out as R rated and they decided to refilm scenes (scenes I bet they FLoCKED up by refiling) so they could make it PG-13. That's a legitimate reason to complain. |
Yeah, this fact, in and of itself, is quite disheartening and overtly disturbing! I want to see a Director's Cut released REAL QUICK with all the scenes put back in to make it the way it WAS MEANT TO BE! Not the way the movie studio hacked it to appease the assumed audience! |
Not a bad copy. Who gonna clean this up? blur our watermark and cut out the ads? |
this is a great cam thx so much , alot cams been very watchable of late and great film m9 a 10 v 9 for cam ts |
It's the same lousy CAM as the other lousy CAM: blurry, poor audio, ads, watermarks. So why keep reposting it? You can repackage it over and over under different names: SUNSCREEN, C1NEM4, etc etc: it doesn' t change the fact it's the same lousy CAM. It will be available for streaming on Peacock by end of February. |
WRONG!!! Watermarks, annoying commercials (about 4 throughout) sure, BUT, NO blurring, CRISP picture, GOOD audio, going from a, SORT OF WATCHABLE 4, to a COMPLETELY WATCHABLE 7.5 (in my opinion, anyway) |
you are wrong as usual, its not same CAM, its much better quality new source and its nothing like old one. people like you who just post for little attention needs to be banned, you have no reason to be here if you do not watch cams. |
I should be banned because I don't watch CAMS? You makes it sound AS IF the entire reason TGX exist is for the sole purpose to create CAMS. There is more to TGX than just CAMS. |
Bullshit, jaxe. First of all: no one said you should be banned for not watching cams, but for posting for no other reason than some attention. Secondly, you were told you're wrong in that it's NOT the same cam. Why do you avoid that point and obscure it by a deliberate distortion? |
Guest-1348, You are the one who is distorting things. Hiding behind your guest account like a child, too coward to show your real name. |
@jaxe No one, but no one shows their REAL name on here This is not a 'REAL NAME' site Unless you name is really 'jaxe' you are just as anonymous as Guest-1348 And yup, this is my REAL NAME |
@jaxe, I believe I read in a previous post you made that English was not your primary language. I think there has been some mis-translations in the meanings you are interpreting. I believe Guest-4161 meant you should not be commenting on things you haven't actually watched. |