As anyone watched it pass minute 5eash? The cheesy narrator's voice and style had me to scream. |
No- It's English Dubbed But this Movie is just Low Budget Tat |
::heavy sigh:: Once again, it's The Misogynist Cult. You can easily ascertain who the cult leader is, and who the followers are "in power" who support and allow that . I mean ... Good God, we can't have a film with a powerful female as the lead or any hint of LGBTQ+ themes because that's "woke liberal fascism" Stop politicizing the entertainment industry. They're finally producing 'entertainment' for ALL races, genders and groups. "Entertainment - It's not just for insecure White Folks anymore!" |
everything is politic your vision, based on people color/gender/, is your racist vision of human kind : / enjoy being market share as much as you want |
I see some innocent europeans who think that hun women are same as their fragile women that want privileges and take the comfortable jobs away from the men. On the contrary huns are trained to be warriors whether man or woman from childhood those that are fragile don't survive long. |
Nobody's fault. Hollywood has run out of new ideas, but they still need to sell their ware somehow, so here goes. |
In that time the only women who were female warriors were the Amazons, all the other countries only had men warriors...In Japan and some other countries you had female assassins but no country had women who openly fought in wars...they ware not helples tho, when the men whent to pillage other cities or countries, the women defended the castle or village/ township...specialy vikings and even nativ american women could fight... |
History says otherwise: - https://www.history.com/news/african-female-warriors - https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180826-the-legend-of-benins-fearless-female-warriors - https://www.livescience.com/59330-beyond-wonder-women-real-female-warriors.html - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_ancient_warfare |
id be a little careful of anything history not in a journal this is how you end up with things like ben franklin discovered electricity,eddison invented the light bulb,paul revere went on a ride,coloumbus discovered america,civil war was about slavery,the stupidity is amazing books are wrote to sell copies not be truth |
@SuperBikeMike - True about books, but the Revisionist History being pushed in the United States by White 'false Christians' and Alt-Right bigots is pretty disturbing. We can never learn from history and/or the mistakes and crimes committed out of greed & in the name of 'God' if we can't teach historical truths. |
and you'll never get it cause greed always wins ... cant even tell people it was a woman that made the ride cause paul revere was to damn drunk to get on a horse "the bar tenders journal" ... sad aint it .... for a while they refused to publish it was a black man that did the 1st heart transplant ... |
And on the otyher hand there are scientific books, which by no means will ever make the Oprah Winfrey book club. Books are not only a means to make profit, they are first and foremost intended to make information widely available. Not everything is a conspiracy. |
its not a conspiracy it is what it is, and show me a scientist that drives a lamborghini and ill show you false facts in his books, they are not about the money its about the math. which in some cases geology are not fact just a hypothesis of what may be .... you seem educated enough to know the difference |
those Amazon warriors you're talking about are fictive, they never excisted; just like Hercules, Zeus, Hades and all those other "gods". Talking about Female Warriors: check Woman King, they where real, or check Barbarians, they where and still are real, check the Irish culture (Banshees), they where and still are real |
@ Superbikemike....Christiaan Neethling Barnard was a South African cardiac surgeon who performed the world's first human-to-human heart transplant operation December 3 1967 and he was white |
my bad, i ment heart surgery and that would be vivien thomas. he was actually the 1st one he has been tossed from most books and discredited because of his color after all it couldnt be a back man no fkin way.odds are those have been more recognized then him because there white. goes well with eddison falsehoods . |
Says the intellectually challenged leftie, who cannot understand anything within their microcosmic area of understanding. |
I doubt women were allowed to be warriors back in 370 AD when the HUNS ruled the Great Steppes. |
Of course they were, why do you think we say..."Hey Hun". |
Google is your bestie .. Did the Huns have female warriors? The Huns had female warriors. Because the main weapon of the Hun army were bows, it was possible for women to join the military ranks. The bows were lightweight and flexible, which made them manageable even for females with a small built. |
They did, but that proves that women are the first to relax and the last to battle. They didnt scream about patriarchy because we allowed them to avoid battle and politics and work. The only time women actually want equal rights is during peacetime when the men get to relax as they do. |
@Sniggy54 Re your bow comment. The amount of draw strength to pull a composite bow back then was immense. To be effective it took developed muscle and a lifetime of training. For example a Mongol Bow took about 100lbs of draw strength which is similar to an English longbow. |
Further to my reply: so unless the (small built) female was trained since she was a child and built like a Russian tank she would not have had either the strength or skill to use a composite bow.. let alone from horseback. Cheers I realise this may offend some.. but it's biology + a lack of training, see? |
History is not your strength then jaxe |
100lbs of draw strength in a bow Imagine getting whacked in the by an arrow from that |
We had catapults back in High School Pretty sure they had at least 100lbs of draw strength |
I mainly take offence with the Plot blurb; 300 AD is centuries after the Greeks and only Europeans were still primitive. The Silk Road had been around since 2000 BCE and Romans traded with China by 170 AD. As such, women certainly would not have been allowed to be warriors; it was lowly work. Doesn't mean they can't. |