Torrent details for "All In with Chris Hayes 2021 01 29 1080p WEBRip x265 HEVC-LM" Log in to bookmark
Controls:
Category:
Language:
EnglishTotal Size:
711.81 MB
Info Hash:
7de7d2e44a0630edd0d29d06abf40bf5f369b59b
Added By:
Added:
31-01-2021 04:49
Stats:
| Update
Name
DL
Uploader
Size
S/L
Added
-
241.59 MB
385
[3/0]
23/09/21 16:15
Uploaded by Hemophile  | Size 241.59 MB | Health [3/0] | Added 23/09/21 16:15 |
-
241.63 MB
323
[2/0]
14/10/21 15:33
| Uploaded by Hemophile | Size 241.63 MB | Health [2/0] | Added 14/10/21 15:33 |
-
214.86 MB
257
[2/0]
06/10/21 06:32
| Uploaded by Hemophile | Size 214.86 MB | Health [2/0] | Added 06/10/21 06:32 |
Title:
All In with Chris Hayes (2013)
Genre:
News, Talk-Show
Runtime:
60 min - Rating: 6.4
Director:
n/A
Cast:
Plot:
All In with Chris Hayes is political television program hosted by Chris Hayes and features in-depth political commentary from prominent politicians, journalists and political strategists. The program airs weeknights on the cable news channel MSNBC.
MSNBC
All In with Chris Hayes
January 29, 2021
Resolution: 1920x1080
Duration: 44 minutes
Partial list of segment titles:
- Arizona GOP rep introduces bill to give Legislature power to throw out election results
Screenshot:
Torrent Hash: 7de7d2e44a0630edd0d29d06abf40bf5f369b59b
All In with Chris Hayes
January 29, 2021
Resolution: 1920x1080
Duration: 44 minutes
Partial list of segment titles:
- Arizona GOP rep introduces bill to give Legislature power to throw out election results
Screenshot:
Torrent Hash: 7de7d2e44a0630edd0d29d06abf40bf5f369b59b
User comments Sort newest first
by miok
on 2021-02-02 12:32:11
 | @Guest-2852 Not allowing you to comment unless you create an account would be censorship. You may have noticed we're one of the very few sites that do allow it. Asking and expecting you to make comments on an adult level without being vulgar is not. If you can't be civil and comment without insulting others, your remarks will continue to be removed. Even better, if you're so concerned about censorship, make an account. Stop hiding behind anonymity and put a name on your comments. |
by Guest-1604
on 2021-02-01 10:38:11
 | seems like some mod likes deleting the comment here? they should delete the other ones too, let's be thorough. as usual, censorship only proves all the points deleted... https://torrentgalaxy.to/torrent/14271069/All-In-with-Chris-Hayes-2021-01-28-1080p-WEBRip-x265-HEVC-LM please delete those two comments as well, and then will promise to go away permanently. also, while deleting those give this a glance, per usual, https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/censorship pretty sad that a blocked torrent indexer has even worse censorship practices than gargantuan oligopolistic tech corporations. appreciation to LarMer though for at least letting propaganda be free and who isn't responsible for deleting comments. that is the purview of whatever unfortunate rogue mod who likes censorship of ideas they clearly disagree with... |
by Guest-1412
on 2021-02-01 15:30:39
| it's a 1080p rip in x265, of course the quality is fine. just like all the other uploads for these shows. if it is normal then why weren't those other comments deleted? (or the plethora from last year?) clearly it was censored because a mod or admin didn't like it, a form of complaint itself, and would venture to say a truly palpable form of complaint, one of with censorship blotting something out when it could just be innocuously ignored. the comment was perfectly on topic, politics, radicalism, economics, SARS-CoV-2, and wasn't a complaint, merely a _comment_. maybe it had some "feeling", or distinct perspective, so what? the person who deleted it, now that is an actual complaint, and a cowardly one at that. presumably it wasn't you so I won't tell you to just chill. presumably you just are siding with the mod, which is your privilege. but whoever deleted it, maybe you should direct your advice to them? in the meantime anyone, few, stumbling upon this can just imagine what was the nature of the so-called now mysterious "complaining" deleted comment, that only was by a guest and "irrelevant". thus, with your verdict will now cease commenting. no worries. |
by Guest-3043
on 2021-02-02 19:21:59
| doesn't seem like that would be censorship, that would just be clear policy (unless the "lucky" undeleted comment above would also be deleted for all these very blurry "reasons"? based on this admonishment that's presumably a yes.) so far it seems none of the reasons really honestly track the reality which is as simple as that the person who deleted it didn't like it, ditto, ditto... why even allow anonymous comments anyway? either deal with accepting that expression, or shut it down, what is the point doing it otherwise? nuke violent threats, doxxes, slurbombs, spam, let the rest flow. why is this so difficult for humanity? "adult level" is another vaguery weaselword, what does that even mean? again, "foul language" and now "vulgar", where is that in the site rules? vulgar? and which part was particularly estimated to be "vulgar"? how are all these defined? was it all vulgar? perhaps definitely overstated it comparing a torrent indexer allowing anonymous comments to oligopolies' mass censoring, so apologize for that. still, clearly similar issues... to be clear absolutely no one made any request or guidance to comment "on an adult level" (until now, that is). and indeed, maintain the comment was "adult level". semantics? so whatever is composed, should always remember and see everything in the "light" of asking, "hmm, is this on _someone else's_ adult level or what?" let's rehash: the comment was only point-blank deleted and then only followed-up after these multiple interregnums. so, the choice is continue as am and those comments will be deleted, but create an account (which won't happen anyways) and they will still be deleted? oh, by the way, was always civil and what local _individual_ got insulted again? anyone chooses themselves to be offended, and at what? here it is still a mystery. the context of comments in all of this series here is illuminating though... this comment was undeleted but in the future will be deleted? sigh. wouldn't it have saved us all a little time to just leave the initial comment deleted? sincerely, anonymous collocation of synapses, just as good as any other username, which is defacto anonymous anyway, so "hiding behind", semantics... will save you the "trouble", no more remarks. |
by Mafketel
on 2021-02-01 12:47:00
 | Just chill... Its normal that comments like that will be deleted. They have nothing to do with the torrent. No mention of the quality... Only someone who is complaining about something that isn't relevant and only posting as a guest. |
by Guest-2852
on 2021-02-02 05:57:56
| thank you for stating why you deleted it and undeleting it. foul language though? presumably it wasn't the part about the federal reserve, how can breast feeding be foul, other than when the federal reserve is involved with trillions, so that doesn't seem to be it. instead it was the part about the bipartisan cartel wreaking economic catastrophe and creating the cultural decay it hypocritically decries from all of its propaganda organs? reading comments isn't a requirement for users. presumably everyone on a torrent tracker that offers endless porn can make these decisions themselves and assume that maybe if they decide to read a comment there may be "foul language" (a vague standard ranging for whoever is doing the judging). other than the few ignoramuses on that goodreads list of censorship quotes (and even those people have points in the context of censorship, no matter how reprehensible their "philosophies" are, that is the point against, or pointlessness, of censoring) all this is widely dealt with. if torrentgalaxy doesn't want to define "foul language" in the site rules then it's very unclear what that means other than creating a chilling effect on the formation of, for lack of a better word, anyone jotting down a comment. so then the reference must either be to https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=crapped%20the%20bed or the colloquialism term employed in response to the hypocrisy of the democratic leadership presented as "going big" on relief when they intentionally offered no relief in order to further their political power (which for decades hasn't served americans nor the world at all well). then, thusly that is what produced my response to this deletion. which again, thank you for undeleting it. if that's all it was, then am left second-guessing that anything may be "foul language". the only reason I posted the goodreads list of quotes yet again is because there are many points in that, however the most instructive one is the aforementioned idea of creating "acceptable use of language", that is a formula for subjective censorship. or even worse really, self-censorship. outside of direct explicit violent threats, doxxing and other bullshit, it is unclear how to be "better" than any historical censors (of which there are many) or the mass censorship that is occurring today. |
by Guest-7511
on 2021-02-01 11:15:06
| to the mod who censors, or overseers of that entity: in the past, months ago, commenting, when yours truly was more present, did re-paste deleted comments, yet am sort of numb and regardless realize none of this matters. however, will see how this lands, without reposting, and if left censored promise to pack up back into the abyss... so easy solution for everyone either way, unlike "our" (collective humanity everywhere) politics. |
by Guest-5970
on 2021-02-01 00:10:37
| most humans are not "generally" smart. most are generally dumb. best that can be said is that some are specifically smart, very few generally so. this is the history of humanity, people generally doing idiotic things. no coordination or affiliations need be required. just the rampant lunacy of power, or more often than not lack thereof. one of the dumbest ideas to draw conclusions of affiliations and causality in spheres of idiotic human behavior that cannot explicitly be linked. a version of fooled by randomness combined with confirmation bias and immense dunning kruger. which is why the democrats and republicans are both such enormous hypocrites, and the media buttressing them even worse because they are merely their lemmings. they both (and their "football" team "fans") do this incessantly. this precisely is what the previous two comments were about, that convenient and powerlessly inept enemies are indeed the gift that keeps giving to both "sides". one side uses "baby murder" and "jeebus superstition", and guns for good measure. even oblivious by choice obama knows this is true about the "other" side per his "hot mic", hence he of course, wink wink, nod nod, knows this about his "own". that is, the neo"liberals" use woke promoting and every other virtue signalling void of commonsense to distract from actual broad class based interests while sounding the three alarm fire of constant panic about the "radicals", "rightwing-extremists", "militias", "white supremacists", newer derivations, etc, all criminally jokes. the joke inversion on the other "side"? so-called "antifa". all perfect ruses for all the lobbyists, corporations, newsmedia parrots, and farcicial politicians to keep rabble rousing their brainwashed masses of ignorant philistines and philosophical zombies, ideologically with their faces painted their team's colors. "go big" on jamming up doing anything for selfish political reasons while orange "hitler" is in office only to comeback around after "winning", under the cloud of the pandemic, causing over a quarter of a year or more of economic damage to people and small business meanwhile megacorporations expanding sucking on the teet of the fed. no "go big" against med insurance which is a scam, gtfo with that shit biden admin. what a decades long crapping of the bed, clinton, bush, obama, trump, biden, can't make this shit up. |
Comments need intelligible text (not only emojis or meaningless drivel).
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.
No upload requests, visit the forum or message the uploader for this.
Use common sense and try to stay on topic.