Yup. The comercials are crystal clear and high def. The fact is theres a raspy whine thru the whole movie making it hard to understand the dialog. The room that the HDcam was in must be pretty noisy. I will no doubt look for web rips soon so I can hear what everybody was saying. These people saying this is great quality must be shillers for the ads in the movie. |
Wow, thank you, I didn't realize I had clicked on what must have been just released in a compressed 800mb version and was commenting on it. Thank you very much, it follows suit with the other one's as well...and aligns to my comment above, which I thought was on the 1.31GB version still. This just amends to my previous comment, so thank you very much for taking the time, sure many people will now be able to enjoy the Movie in much better quality, if they would give it a chance. A CAM version doesn't mean wait for Blu-Ray or Web any more, the gap is narrowing, even with a few ads, and a watermark. I would ask the same people. if you ever watch any television show from a local channel from let's say your cable tv in the past, they also show their "synbol", which blends in with the channel for the duration, so why complain about a small watermark, it's analogous to it. Also, if the 2-3 ads bother you that much that you have to say something to the gracious people that took the time and effort to get timely and high quality movies in the best possible format at the time, then go somewhere else, and stop whining about it, please, please be positive on the site for not just all of us, but the people that are bringing it to us, and put the shoe on the other foot, until you can do what they do, keep it real and positive or don't say anything that undermine's what they do, bc it takes time and effort, and it's their choice, so please for them, think for a sec, and remember there are people that have to do some intense work to get you the movies,, shows etc., and applause to them, daily for their consistency, talent, desire, and most of all dedication and motivation to do it for us. Think fora sec and realize they could be selfish and keep the movies for example to themselves, I'd block you if it was me, why share with an ingrate? So please think before speaking, great team out there....I thank you and know countless others do, consistently, and heck yeah we're always wanting the latest and greatest, so we say thank you for providing it to us. |
thx for sharing movie watchable . but missing parts but better than nil copy thx no subtitles |
I don't know about the gap narrowing between 8K and UHDCAM I would say that UHDCAM has now overtaken 8K in terms of quality It really is a case now that if you want a low-grade copy you have to wait for the web-rip, Blu-Ray rip, release print, digital cinema copy or master print to come out |
thx for sharing movie watchable . but missing parts but better than nil copy thx |
i watched this 2 weeks ago - massively overrated - its basically a straight to dvd sequel released for cinema. its just a retread of the first but with no memorable scenes at all. you will forget it after you watch it ( thats if you don't nod off before it ends that is) |
Super Quality especially having seen v1, would advise others to wait for a v2, as they've been coming out recently after the v1's, and the video is so much better, even on just a regular tv if you will that's not the top of the line with all the bells and whistles, perhaps 5 years old but supports everything modern, and is a smart tv, so it's old-old, however wouldn't be practical to download other versions like DD on it as it wouldn't show a difference vs. a 720p or perhaps a 480p.. Thanx for making the effort to get us another v2, and sure you'll come out with a compressed version of this one at 800mg soon like the others, if you find a need. |
Imagine how much money he must be doing with the ads to protect a V/A going form a 4 in the cam category to a V:5/A:4 in cam category. Just be glad nobody knows its you in real life and they are not pointing and laughing at you. |
@ Guest-1419 Very true, but I had to rewind that mumbling dude a few times as I felt I was missing out on key elements of the 'plot'. Must have doubled the run-time |